Why HIV Does Not Cause AIDS

Contrary to popular belief, there is no evidence tosample was found to be HIV positive.
show that HIV is the harmful virus it is said to be. ItHere are the bullet points that are well supported
is one of over a hundred odd retroviruses. So called awith evidence that HIV does not cause AIDS.
retrovirus because of the way in which it invades the*HIV does not destroy the T-helper cells it invades.
host cells in the body it infects...*The number of infected T-cells are too low to
In contrast to the general belief,there is no evidencecause AIDS
to show that HIV is the harmful virus it is said to be.*There is no convincing evidence to show that there
It is one of over a hundred odd retroviruses. Sois such a thing as a 'latent period', the time lapse
called a retrovirus because of the way in which itbefore HIV causes infection
invades the host cells in the body it infects. The host*To this day, the HIV virus has never been isolated
cells are called the T-cells (or T-helper cells) a type ofand therefore there is no empirical proof of its
white blood cell involved in providing immunity; theexistence. There have been many wagers offered to
body's natural defence against disease. During thethe person who can successfully isolate and identify
early stages of infection, heavy cold or flu-likethe HIV virus. So far there have been no takers.
symptoms manifest. About 10-14 days later the*No one has ever been able to show that there is a
individual returns to being healthy again. Take thegene in HIV responsible for giving rise to AIDS.
story of Dr Robert E. Willner. So convinced that HIV*The laboratory test method for HIV is greatly
is A harmless virus and wanting to prove it to theflawed and unreliable. If you are finding all this very
public at large,he injected himself with the blood ofdifficult to accept,then take a look at the disclaimers
an HIV-positive haemophiliac on a live Spanishthat comes with the various test kits. You will clearly
television chat show! Yes, he was okay and deemedfind that basically, they echo what I have been
HIV negative after!saying: that they are unreliable. -The punch line to all
Another piece of evidence exposing the absurd ideathis lunacy should be made loud and clear.
that HIV is Harmful comes from a random sample ofDon't take the ''HIV'' test. If you are offered it then
Japanese people. AIDS was unknown in this country.refuse at all costs!
Amazingly, it was found that 25% of a randomDon't play Russian roulette with your life.