The Changing Perspective of Mass Poverty

People in wealthy countries are not wealthy becauseneeded to make even these measures effective -
people in poverty-stricken countries arenets must be re-impregnated with insecticide,
poverty-stricken, nor vice versa. Wealthy countrieseducation needs committed parents and educated
are wealthy mainly because they have benefitedteachers, HIV treatment requires a public health
from two centuries or more of evolution of theirinfrastructure and water systems require
political, economic and social institutions.maintenance. Even if such measures do not lead to
Poverty-stricken countries are poverty-strickenrapid economic growth they will make impoverished
mainly because they have not.lives better.
Even if this is partly true then the capacity ofBut while thoughtful observers of international
wealthy countries to "make poverty history" isdevelopment have moved from advocating broad
extremely limited. Wealthy countries can damagepolitical programmes to targeted intervention, Sir Bob
poverty-stricken countries, by devastating their socialGeldof has moved in the opposite direction. The first
structures or pillaging their resources, and they onceLive Aid concert sought funds for famine relief and
did. De colonisation brought a common optimismwas profoundly moving, but the supposed purpose is
about what could be achieved. Modern technologynow to raise consciousness and not money. What
was available, so poverty-stricken countries could beshould we do when our consciousness has been
spared the long and difficult process of developmentraised? The UK's Make Poverty History campaign
as experienced by existing wealthy countries. Withoffers advice: wear a white arm band, go to
sufficient inward-investment in infrastructure, plantEdinburgh, send an e-mail to the prime minister and
and machinery and education they could progressjust be mindful about what is happening in the world.
rapidly towards higher standards of living and ofIt is time to get serious.
course aid could bridge the funding gap. In retrospect,The good news about extreme poverty is that more
this all seems naive. Some do still argue that thesepeople have been lifted out of it in the past 10 years
measures failed because of insufficient resources, butthan in any decade in world history; that this is mainly
there is general acceptance that the principalthe result of rapid economic growth in China and
weakness of the programme was inadequateIndia, which is in turn principally due to internal reform
attention to institutions.not external action; that the real contributions of
But the modern mantra that institutions matterwealthy countries have mainly been through trade
became equally simplistic. The complexity of historicaland investment, not aid; and that world leaders have
experience was discarded in favour of the belief thatplayed only a minor though constructive role in that
the necessary institutions could be described in a fewprocess. The lesson is that world poverty will be
phrases - free markets, limited government, privateended by the actions of poverty-stricken people
property and fiscal prudence. Most poverty-strickenthemselves.
countries given this medicine spat it out before it hadWe in wealthy countries can make a modest
time to take effect, which enables those whocontribution but if the United Nations' millennium
administered it to continue to argue for its efficiency.development goals to eradicate poverty are met,
It does not really matter whether the drug failswhich is unlikely, it will be the achievement of the
because it is ineffective or because the patientpoverty-stricken, not the wealthy, and the
cannot accept it, what matters is that the drug failed.achievement of individuals, not politicians. The idea
Since then analysis and policy have focused onthat leaders have the power to "make poverty
small-scale issues that make a demonstrablehistory" but have been insufficiently engaged to
difference, such as the provision of malaria nets andexercise that power is ludicrous. Suggesting that
pure water, free elementary education and thepolitical action is the source of economic advance
prevention and treatment of HIV and Aids. It isreinforces the mistakes that have made poverty all
daunting to discover how many other changes aretoo prevalent.