RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

Employers often incorporate post-terminationrequired to protect legitimate business interests.
obligations into an employee's contract ofLeverage for negotiations
employment whereby an employee agrees not to doThe issues that need to be considered in relation to
certain things after he or she leaves the company.restrictive covenants will vary considerably from case
These obligations are called restrictive covenants.to case and from employee to employee and, as
They are designed to protect the employer'susual employers are advised to seek professional
business and are particularly common in the contractsguidance. The point is that covenants can work to
of employment of sales staff who have access toprotect an employer's business. They provide
and intimate knowledge of an employer's customerleverage even if an employer would rather not
base, or senior directors and other key employees.pursue the matter to a full court hearing or
There are broadly four types of restrictive covenant:application for an injunction. They can be used as a
1. non-compete covenants – which seek tocornerstone in termination negotiations with
prevent an ex-employee from directly competing orex-employees. Details of the covenants can even be
working for a competitor, usually within a specificsent to an ex-employee's new employers to place
geographical area, for a set period followingthem on notice that any breach of the covenant by
termination;the former employee could also give rise to a claim
 of "inducing a breach of contract" against the new
2. non-solicitation/non-dealing covenants – whichemployer. However, the covenant must have, at
seek to prevent an ex-employee from entering intoleast on the face of it, some chance of being
working relationships with former customers, byenforced if it is going to be taken seriously by the
seeking or accepting orders for goods and services,ex-employee or his new employers.
for a set period following termination.;The Employee's Perspective
3. non-solicitation of employees – which seek toDenying an individual the ability to work and make a
prevent an ex-employee from recruiting formerliving in an industry in which they are experienced and
colleagues for a set period following termination;in which they have developed a specific set of skills
4. restrictions on the use of confidential informationis not something which would ever be done lightly by
– which seek to prohibit the use of anythe courts. Accordingly, covenants which seek to
confidential information (usually identified by aprevent any form of competition with a former
non-exhaustive list of examples) acquired by anemployer are rarely enforced.
employee during employment.Also worth bearing in mind is that if an employer
The interests of both parties must be carefullyterminates the employment relationship wrongfully,
balanced in order to have an enforceable covenant.for example, by failing to follow contractual
On the one hand employers will be understandablydisciplinary procedures or by failing to give due notice
concerned to protect their business interests. On theunder the contract, then the covenants will
other hand some types of restrictive covenants seekautomatically become unenforceable, whether
to impose unreasonable restrictions on employeesreasonable or not. An employer may make a
which on the face of it would seriously prevent thempayment in lieu of notice but this will not necessarily
from operating in the industry in which they arepreserve the enforceability of the covenants,
experienced. There are clearly two sides to theespecially where there is no express right to make a
argument.payment in lieu of notice under the employment
The legal position for enforceability of covenantscontract.
Restrictive covenants must go no further than isWhere an employee leaves of their own accord the
reasonably necessary to protect their legitimatesituation is different. However, the covenants still
business interests otherwise the covenants will beneed to be reasonable to be enforceable. For
deemed to be unlawful restraints of trade andexample, a covenant prohibiting an employee from
rendered unenforceable. However this fairly simplesoliciting the business of former customers with
statement disguises the complex considerationswhom they were regularly involved is more likely to
involved in defining what is "reasonable" and what is abe enforceable than a covenant which simply
"legitimate business interest" in any givenprohibits contact with any of the former employer's
circumstance. For example, a covenant whichcustomers, many of which the employee may never
prevents an employee from working for ahave had contact with.
competitor for a period of six months anywhereConclusion
within the United Kingdom may be enforceableThere are simply no hard and fast rules other than
against a national sales director but would not bethe old maxim – never enter into a contract
appropriate for, say, a hairdresser who only dealsunless you know exactly what you are agreeing to.
with people in the immediate locality. Further, this isProfessional advice is therefore a pre-requisite. It is
not simply an issue about ideas of perceived status.often better to enter into a contract containing
A ten mile geographical restriction might bedraconian covenants which are likely to be
appropriate for a hairdresser working in a rural area,unenforceable, than to seek to have the restrictions
whereas the same restriction placed on a vet (orreduced to the point where they become more
indeed a solicitor) working in an urban location mightreasonable and capable of being enforced.
well be unreasonable.At the end of it all restrictive covenants are a bit of
A further example can be found in covenants againsta game and to get the best results case-law has
the solicitation of former employees. A sales managershown, you need to know the rules.
might be legitimately prevented from recruitingIf you would like any advice on restrictive covenants,
members of his former team for a period after hisor any other aspect of employment law, please
employment ends. However, if the restrictioncontact Caroline Walker on
extended to all employees, including the office junior,cwalker@cavendishlaw.co.uk or telephone 0207 147
it would be difficult for the employer to argue the9974.
restriction was reasonable and went no further than