International Adoption - UNICEF's and Other Critics' War Against International Adoption

UNICEF has been waging war against internationalmiddlemen who were supposedly forcing these
adoption for many years contrary to popularwomen to give up their children, paying the women
understanding. It's a war with results that fall faras an inducement, or even, as many reports claimed,
short of real time solutions to the spoils of itskidnapping these children for adoption. Many of these
victories. UNICEF's premise that parents inreports glossed over the fact that birth mothers had
underdeveloped countries should be provided theto relinquish their child to an attorney advising her of
means to keep their children is not arguable. Neither isher rights, undergo an interview with the Family
UNICEF's stance that international adoption shouldCourt, DNA testing of the birth mother and child,
only be a last resort.review by the Guatemalan Solicitor General's office,
However, UNICEF's tough and effective pressureand once again, the birth mother's consent to the
tactics and lobbying efforts towards developingadoption after the Solicitor General's approval. The
nations calling for ratification of the Hague Treaty forEmbassies regularly interviewed birth mothers and
the Protection of Children and implementation ofconducted investigations at random or of cases that
adoption law and policy models which effectivelyappeared questionable. During the last year of
serve to close programs completely or almostadoptions in Guatemala, a 2nd DNA test was required
completely to foreign adopters belies a misguided,at the end of the process based on accusations of
unrealistic and out of touch policy contrary to thechild switching with unimpressive findings to back up
best interests of hundreds of thousands ofthese wanton allegations.
legitimately orphaned and abandoned children aroundAvila's report indicates that the Guatemalan
the world. These efforts have resulted in the semi orDepartment of Social Welfare has now created
complete closure of adoptions around the world insatellite offices all over the country in an attempt to
such countries as Guatemala, Bulgaria, Paraguay, andincrease its pool of families interested in fostering or
Romania to mention just a few examples.adopting these children. Unfortunately, this is exactly
Let's take the example of Guatemala. After intensethe kind of reform that many adoption attorneys
pressure from UNICEF, Guatemala finally closed itscalled for which would remove involvement by
doors to international adoption on December 31,middlemen but allow attorneys to work with the
2008. Prior to that time, foreign nationals adoptedDepartment of Social Welfare in concert with its
approximately 5,000 Guatemalan children per year.ongoing program to promote foster care and
Oscar Avila, "Guatemala Seeks Domestic Fix toadoption domestically. UNICEF would not come to the
Troubled Overseas Adoptions," Chicago Tribune,table nor would the Guatemalan government which
October 26, 2008 indicated that "Guatemala haswas eager to completely shut the door on
launched an ambitious campaign to recruit fosterinternational adoption in response to UNICEF's strong
parents and even adoptive parents at home." So far,and effective lobbying efforts.
the program is failing miserably. Avila reports, "OnlyAnother example of misguided criticism regarding
about 45 families in a nation of 13 million currentlyinternational adoption is in Malawi, where the infamous
have taken in foster children since the programMadonna adoption took place. Malawi is a country of
began this year."13 million and approximately 1 million are orphans half
The approach that Guatemala is taking by attemptingof which are "AIDS orphans". Solutions are slow in
to gain domestic attention to the problem is certainlycoming in a nation beset by an AIDS epidemic
meritorius; however, this approach could and shouldinfecting almost one fourth of its population. These
have been implemented concomitant with anorphaned children deserve a chance at having
international program which would ensure thatpermanent homes and families. International adoption
thousands of children will find homes rather thanis not a perfect solution to the problem in Malawi and
waste away in institutions that are oftenso many other nations of Africa but it saves lives,
underfunded, understaffed and unable to provide forgives children a chance, one adoption at a time.
the needs of these children.Of course, most would agree that international
One of the main criticisms of the Guatemalanadoption should not be the sole answer to poverty
adoption program prior to its closure was that it wasfaced by nations around the world. No rational person
in the hands of private attorneys who depended onwould think so. International adoption should be seen
sometimes unscrupulous middlemen to procureas a stopgap emergency measure taken while the
birthmothers wanting to give up their children andUnited Nations, human rights groups, humanitarian
perhaps those not wanting to give up their children.organizations and the governments of these
Of course this depiction glosses over the nature ofunderdeveloped countries seek answers to the
how this practice developed in remote villages inabject poverty, high birth rates, AIDS epidemic,
Guatemala, far from the lawyers in Guatemala Citymalnutrition, lack of education, lack of women's rights,
who could arrange adoptions by foreign nationals. Itand massive unemployment which lead to parents
was a practical way to connect birthmothers, whomaking these hard decisions about the future of their
were seeking adoption as an option to their usuallyoffspring. International adoption is one temporary cog
dire circumstances, to attorneys who could then takein the wheel. UNICEF and other detractors and critics
the children into custody through the use of fosterof international adoption have continually failed to
homes and then place the children with familiesrecognize the vital emergency role of international
abroad through adoption proceedings. It is interestingadoption and how compromise and middle ground
to note that neither UNICEF nor the Guatemalansolutions could serve the orphaned and abandoned
government could see that there could be a middlechildren.
ground to solving the problem of unscrupulous